Kesetaraan Gender dalam pengembangan Bimbel Enggon Sin_Au_Qu pada pendidikan non formal Gen-Y dan I-Gen

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35891/jip.v9i2.2891

Keywords:

Gender, Kesetaraan, Non-formal, Pendidikan, Tutor

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has had an impact on all aspects of life, including education. The Indonesian government implemented a Distance Learning policy that made Bimbel Enggon Sin_Au_Qu which is a non-formal education service provider institution adapt and experience an increase in demand for services so that management added tutors. With this development, it is necessary to analyze gender equality in Bimbel Enggon Sin_Au_Qu. The data used is secondary data with a quantitative descriptive approach. The analysis carried out gave results in the form of mapping an increase in the number of students including Gen-Y and I-Gen. In terms of the quantity of tutors at Enggon Sin_Au_Qu as many as 18 people, dominated by female tutors as much as 56% while the remaining 44% are male tutors. The greater quantity of female tutors cannot be separated psychologically from women playing a role in shaping and developing the personality of students. The general description of the data on the role of tutors on students is the role of female tutors by 39% in the development of Gen-Y and I-Gen in Enggon Sin_Au_Qu, while the role of male tutors is greater, namely 61%. Based on these data, there are more female tutors in quantity, but in terms of quality male tutors have a bigger role in the development of non-formal education for Bimbel Enggon Sin_Au_Qu. Thus, it can be concluded that gender equality is the key in developing the non-formal education business of Enggon Sin_Au_Qu.

References

Anantatmula, V.S. and Shrivastav, B. (2012), "Evolution of project teams for Generation Y workforce", International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371211192874

Akbar dkk. (2018). Ketakutan Akan Kehilangan Momen (FOMO) Pada Remaja Kota Samarinda. Jurnal Psikologi, 7(2), 38-47.

Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). (2020). BPS: 270,20 juta Penduduk Indonesia Hasil SP20203. Diunduh dari https://www.bps.go.id/news/2021/01/21/405/bps--270-20-juta-penduduk-indonesia-hasil-sp2020.html tanggal 10 Agustus 2021.

Dewi, Wiwik Candra. (2018). Kebutuhan Tenaga Ahli Dibidang Sains Dan Teknologi Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kualitas Pendidikan. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan. Yogyakarta, Hal. 217-228 : Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa.

Fadlurrohim, I. et al. (2019) ‘Memahami Perkembangan Anak Generasi Alfa Di Era Industri 4.0’, Focus : Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 2(2), 178. https://doi.org/10.24198/focus.v2i2.26235.

Fitriyani, P. (2018). Pendidikan karakter bagi generasi Z. In Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Ke-7 Asosiasi Program Pascasarjana Perguruan Tinggi Muhammadiyah Aisyiyah (APPPTMA). Jakarta, 23–25.

Hasanah & Uswatun. (2019). Peran Pendidik dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Gender pada Anak Usia Dini di Kober Tunas Bangsa. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 43-49.

Hanayati, C. (2016) Profesionalitas guru ditinjau dari aspek motivasi dan status akademik (proposal fiktif). Available at: http://c-hanayati.blogspot.com/2016/07/v-behaviorurldefaultvmlo.html (Accessed: 15 January 2022).

Handayani, I. (2019) ‘Konsep Bimbingan dan Konseling Pribadi-Sosial dalam Pengembangan Positive Mental Attitude Generasi Z’, NALAR: Jurnal Peradaban dan Pemikiran Islam, 3(1), 51–63. https://doi.org/10.23971/njppi.v3i1.1283.

Haryono. (2015). Learning Achievement Improvement Efforts Course Learn and Learning using the Jigsaw Method and Card Media in STKIP Pgri Ngawi 2014/2015 Academic Year. Journal of Education and Practice. 6(30). 94-102.

Hidayat, Z. Saefuddin, Asep & Sumartono. (2016). Motivasi, Kebiasaan, dan Keamanan Penggunaan Internet. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 13(2), 129-150.

Marisa, C. (2020) ‘Gambaran Motivasi Belajar Pada Siswa Generasi Z dan Implikasinya dalam Pelayanan Bimbingan dan Konseling di Sekolah’, Guidance, 17(2), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.34005/guidance.v17i02.1117.

Nurwahyuni, A. (2019). Literature Review: Perbedaan Pendidikan Karakter yang Diterapkan pada Generasi X, Y dan Z. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional. Presented at the Psikologi Pendidikan.

Prawanti, Lia dan Sumarni, & Woro. (2020). Kendala Pembelajaran Daring Selama Pandemic Covid-19. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana UNNES, ISSN: 2686 6404. Semarang : Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Przybylski, A. K., Murayama, K., DeHan, C. R, & Gladwell, V. (2013). Motivational, Emotional and Behavioural Correlates of Fear of Missing Out. Computer in human behavior, 29(4), 1841- 1848.

Putra, Y.S. (2016) ‘Teori Perbedaan Generasi’, Among Makarti, 9(18), p. 124.

Rakhmah, & Diyan Nur. (2021). Gen Z Dominan, Apa Maknanya bagi Pendidikan Kita? https://puslitjakdikbud.kemdikbud.go.id/produk/artikel/detail/3133/gen-z-dominan-apa-maknanya-bagi-pendidikan-kita diakses 5 Agustus 2021.

Ramadhani. (2013). Efektivitas Konseling Kognitif Perilaku dengan Teknik Restrukturisasi Kognifif untuk Mereduksi Kejenuhan Belajar Peserta Didik. Skripsi. Bandung. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Soedjiwo, N.A.F. (2021) ‘Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Ekonomi Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Ekonomi’, Jurnal Widya Balina, 6(1), 159–172.

Yonanda, (2012). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Index Card Match Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Terhadap Materi Perubahan Lingkungan Fisik Siswa Kelas Iv Sdn Ampeldento 02 Malang. Skripsi. fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan. Malang : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kesetaraan Gender dalam pengembangan Bimbel Enggon Sin_Au_Qu pada pendidikan non formal Gen-Y dan I-Gen. (2022). Jurnal Psikologi : Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan, 9(2), 196-210. https://doi.org/10.35891/jip.v9i2.2891