Digital Privacy and Netizens’ Reactions to Obscene Videos: Perspectives from Cyberpsychology and Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35891/4772gq94Keywords:
criminal law, cyberpsychology, digital privacy, digital revictimization, public reactionAbstract
This study aims to analyze netizens’ responses to a case involving an indecent video featuring a teacher from a cyberpsychology perspective and to examine the associated criminal law implications. The study employed a descriptive qualitative approach, utilizing data collection techniques such as digital observation, unstructured interviews, and documentation. The study’s informants consisted of ten individuals selected through purposive sampling based on their involvement in accessing, following, or responding to information related to the case under investigation. Data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña through the stages of data condensation, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results indicate that netizens’ responses are not homogeneous but encompass empathetic responses, victim-blaming, passive consumption, and content-saving practices. Although most informants understood the importance of digital privacy, this understanding is not always accompanied by behavior that supports privacy protection. This study also found a gap between normative legal awareness and understanding of the legal protection mechanisms available to victims. Furthermore, netizens’ involvement occurs not only through the act of sharing information but also through activities such as accessing, saving, and following case developments, which contribute to the continued exposure of victims in the digital space.
References
Alshehri, A. (2024). A Review of Online Information Privacy Theories Advanced in Eight AIS Journals Over the Last Decade. Information Resources Management Journal, 37(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4018/IRMJ.349977
Böhm, G., Pfister, H. R., Ayres-Pereira, V., & Tjøstheim, I. (2024). E-privacy Concerns: A Facet Theoretical Approach. Journal of Risk Research, 27(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2023.2288012
Connolly, L. Y., Lang, M., & Gibony, J. (2025). A Study of the Privacy Paradox Amongst Young Adults in the United Arab Emirates. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 19(1). 100248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2025.100248
Firdaus, A., & Wardhani, D. F. (2025). Protecting Privacy in the Digital Era: Personal Data Security in Indonesia. Inovasi Pembangunan: Jurnal Kelitbangan, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.35450/jip.v13i1.915
Ismarina. (2025). Determinants of Victim Blaming among Students in Sexual Violence Cases: A Case Study at Faletehan University, Indonesia. Contagion: Scientific Periodical Journal of Public Health and Coastal Health, 7(1), 259–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.30829/contagion.v7i1.23802
Lutz, C., Baruh, L., Quinn, K., Epstein, D., Masur, P. K., & Wilhelm, C. (2025). Comparative Approaches to Studying Privacy: Introduction to the Special Issue. Social Media + Society, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251344460
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
Mustika, U. D., Utami, W., & Widodo. (2025). Pemanfaatan Psikologi Forensik untuk Pencegahan Kekerasan Seksual Berbasis Elektronik antar -Warga Kampus. Maksigama, 19(1), 27-40.
Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in context: Technology, policy, and the integrity of social life. Stanford University Press.
Republik Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Pelindungan Data Pribadi.
Republik Indonesia. (2024). Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.
Solove, D. J. (2008). Understanding privacy. Harvard University Press.
Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1089/1094931041291295
Ubino, S., & Astuti, K. (2025). The impact of victim blaming on social media and handling efforts for victims of sexual violence. Research Horizon, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.54518/rh.5.4.2025.758
Wright, E., Eriksson, L., & Bond, C. E. W. (2025). Victim Blaming, Gender, and Social Media Commentary: A Randomized Vignette Study of Audience Comments on News Reports of Intimate Partner Homicide. Journal of interpersonal violence, 41(9-10), 1836–1863. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251322816
Wu, M., Wu, T., & Xiao, Y. (2025). Why people share misinformation on social media? An integration of affordance and flow theories. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, 1129. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05511-6
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ulfa Dyah Mustika, Galih Setyo Refangga, Sri Wiworo Retno, Sigit Budi Santoso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author sends the manuscript with the understanding that if accepted for publication, the copyright of the article belongs to the author and retains publishing rights without restriction.
Copyright includes the non-exclusive right to reproduce and submit articles in all forms and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilm, and other similar reproductions, as well as translations. Reproduction of any part of this journal, its storage in the database, and its transmission by all forms of media, such as electronic, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopying, recording, magnetic media, etc.
