Analisis technology contribution coefficient (TCC) di UKM Gazal Makmur

Analysis of Technology Contribution Coefficient (TCC) at Gazal Makmur SMEs

  • Cahyuni Novia Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Nurul Jadid, Probolinggo, Jawa Timur https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5697-7492
  • Iqnatia Sundus Anisa Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Nurul Jadid, Probolinggo, Jawa Timur
  • Ika Rafidah Fakultas Teknik, Universitas Nurul Jadid, Probolinggo, Jawa Timur
Keywords: Cassava chips, Contribution of Technology, TCC, Pairwise Comparison

Abstract

Technology is an important aspect for the success of an industry. Gazal Makmur UKM is an UKM that processes cassava into chips in Gazal Hamlet, Kotaanyar Village, Kotaanyar District, Probolinggo Regency. This study aims to calculate the value of the technology component contribution coefficient (TCC) and determine the priority of technology component development in Gazal Makmur SMEs. The method used in this study is the technometric method, namely the technology assessment method used to evaluate the contribution of technology components and the pairwise comparison matrix approach. The measured technology components include technoware (production equipment), humanware (human resource capabilities), infoware (information tools), and orgaware (organizational tools). The results of this study indicate that the contribution of the Orgaware component is the highest in Gazal Makmur SMEs (0.578), then humanware (0.467), humanware (0.252), and the smallest is technoware (0.0.244). The TCC value for Gazal Makmur SMEs is 0.418. The results of this calculation show that these SMEs have a TCC value below 0.7 and above 0.3, meaning that it can be concluded that these SMEs are classified as having a semi-modern level of technology with a reasonable technology category for the SME scale. Improving the quality of Gazal Makmur cassava chips SMEs starts from the orgaware component then humanware, infoware and finally orgaware.

References

Antesty, S., & Tontowi, A. E. (2020). Analisi kontribusi komponen teknologi umkm kota bontang menggunakan metode teknometrik. Jurnal Riset Teknologi Industri, 14(2), 230-240.

Antesty, S., Tontowi, A. E., & Kusumawanto, A. (2020). Mapping the degree of technological capability in small and medium industry of automotive components. ASEAN Journal of Systems Engineering, 4(1), 13-19.

Ayu, R.A. (2018). Analisis kontribusi komponen teknologi dalam pengembangan pertanian padi konvensional menuju organik dan pengaruhnya terhadap produksi padi dan produksi, produktivitas dan pendapatan usaha tani di Kecamatan Sambirejo, Kabupaten Sragen. Universitas Pembangunan Nasional. Yogyakarta.

BPS Kabupaten Probolinggo. (2020). Produksi tanaman pangan.

Kementerian Koperasi dan Kecil dan Menengah Republik Indonesia. (2019). Sinergitas Pengembangan KUMKM melalui Penguatan Peran Antar Lembaga. Kementerian KUKM RI.

Matin, Y. A., & Toloui, A. 2014. Measuring Technological Level and Capability of the Industries in East Azerbaijan and Providing Proper Strategies for Improvement and Promotion of Technology. Advances in Environmental Biology 8(25): 408–413.

Novia, C., Saiful, S., & Utomo, D. (2021). Analisis SWOT peningkatan daya saing pada UKM keripik nangka di Kabupaten Malang. Teknologi Pangan: Media Informasi dan Komunikasi Ilmiah Teknologi Pertanian, 12(1), 69-77.

Purnomo CA, Hadi Y. 2017. Pengukuran kinerja umkm menggunakan performance prism. Spektrum Industri 15(2): 121-136. https://doi.org/10.12928/si.v15i2.7550

Sanyal, S., & Hisam, M. W. (2018). The impact of teamwork on work performance of employees: A study of faculty members in Dhofar University. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 20(3), 15-22.

Subali, S. B. W.(2019) BUSINESS OWNERS’PERCEPTION OF THE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROCESS ADOPTION IN MEDIUM SCALE MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN INDONESIA.International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET) Volume 10, Issue 05, May 2019, pp. 18-29.

Sulistiyowati, W., & Jakaria, R. B. 2018. Assessment of Technology Content Level With Integrated Technometrics and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Methods in small and medium enterprises. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Annual Applied Science And Engineering Conference 434(1) :1-10.

Suryana, D. 2012. Mengenal Teknologi Mulai dari Pengenalan, Sejarah, dan Sampai Teknologi Sekarang. Andi Offset. Yogyakarta

Susihono, W. (2013). Penilaian teknologi untuk menentukan posisi industri pesaing. J@ ti Undip: Jurnal Teknik Industri, 7(2), 131-138.

UNESCAP (1989). Technology Atlas Project. A Framework For Technology Based Development: Technology Content Assessment & Technology Climate Assessment, Volume 2 & 3. Indrawati SW. 2003.

Utomo, S., & Setiastuti, N. 2019. Penerapan Metode Technometrik Untuk Penilaian Kapabilitas Teknologi Industri Galangan Kapal Dalam Menyongsong Era Industri 4.0. JSAKTI (Jurnal Sains Komputer Dan Informatika), 3(1): 100.

Wiratmaja, I.W & Ma’ruf, A. (2004). The Assesment of Technology in Supporting Industry Located at Tegal Industrial Park. Proceddings of Marine Transportation Engineering Seminar. Osaka University.Jepang.

Yahman, M. B., Widada, D., & Profita, A. (2020). Analisis risiko dan penentuan strategi mitigasi pada proses produksi beras. MATRIK: Jurnal Manajemen dan Teknik Industri Produksi, 20(2), 67-78.

Smith, R., & Sharif, N. (2007). Understanding and acquiring technology assets for global competition. Technovation, 27(11), 643-649.

Mason, K., Friesl, M., & Ford, C. J. (2017). Managing to make markets: Marketization and the conceptualization work of strategic nets in the life science sector. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 52-69.

Published
2021-09-12
How to Cite
Novia, C., Anisa, I. S., & Rafidah, I. (2021). Analisis technology contribution coefficient (TCC) di UKM Gazal Makmur. Teknologi Pangan : Media Informasi Dan Komunikasi Ilmiah Teknologi Pertanian, 12(2), 277-286. https://doi.org/10.35891/tp.v12i2.2681
Section
Artikel