Perilaku petani padi terhadap risiko usahatani pada suku yang berbeda di Jawa Timur

Rice farmers' behavior towards farming risks in different tribes in East Java

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35891/agx.v14i2.4199

Keywords:

behavior, ethnic, price risk, production risk

Abstract

Introduction: The agricultural sector is a sector that depends on natural conditions so that uncertainty and risk in farming always occurs. The source of risk is predicted to continue to grow which greatly affects the total agricultural yield. Farming risk consists of production risk and price. Production risk is related to production uncertainty. Price risk is related to price fluctuations that cause losses to farmers because prices are difficult to predict. Indonesia is known for its diversity with nearly 300 ethnicities. Each ethnic group has different characteristics in behavior, language and customs. This difference is possible to influence decisions in managing a business, including in dealing with farming risks. This study attempts to analyze the behavior of rice farmers on the risk of farming among various ethnic groups in East Java and factors that influence farmer behavior towards farming risk. Methods: This research was conducted in Pamekasan, Ngawi and Pasuruan, where these three districts represent Javanese, Madurese, and Madura-Javanese ethnic assimilation. The data used are primary data collected from 49 respondents in Pamekasan Regency, 72 in Ngawi Regency and 65 in Pasuruan Regency so that a total of 186 respondents using the cluster sampling approach. Farmers' behavior towards farm risk was analyzed using the Just and Pope risk function model with the utility function approach, while the analysis of factors that influenced behavior towards farm risk was carried out using multiple regression. Results: The results of the analysis show that the behavior of rice farmers in Pamekasan District with Madura ethnic risk seekers, in Pasuruan Regency is a risk averse and in Ngawi Regency is a risk seeker. Conclusion: Regression analysis shows that differences in ethnicity of farmers affect the way rice farmers deal with farming risks

References

Ahmad, D., Afzal, M., & Rauf, A. (2019). Analysis of wheat farmers’ risk perceptions and attitudes: evidence from Punjab, Pakistan. Natural Hazards, 95(3), 845-861.

Akhtar, S., Li, G. C., Nazir, A., Razzaq, A., Ullah, R., Faisal, M., ... & Raza, M. H. (2019). Maize production under risk: The simultaneous adoption of off-farm income diversification and agricultural credit to manage risk. Journal of integrative agriculture, 18(2), 460-470.

Asravor, R. K. (2019). Farmers’ risk preference and the adoption of risk management strategies in Northern Ghana. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(5), 881-900.

Crentsil, C., Gschwandtner, A., & Wahhaj, Z. (2020). The effects of risk and ambiguity aversion on technology adoption: Evidence from aquaculture in Ghana. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 179, 46-68.

Duong, T. T., Brewer, T., Luck, J., & Zander, K. (2019). A global review of farmers’ perceptions of agricultural risks and risk management strategies. Agriculture, 9(1), 1-16.

Fahad, S., Wang, J., Khan, A. A., Ullah, A., Ali, U., Hossain, M. S., ... & Bilal, A. (2018). Evaluation of farmers' attitude and perception toward production risk: Lessons from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 24(6), 1710-1722.

Fausayana, I., Abdullah, W. G., Susanti, F., Sidu, D., Arimbawa, P., & Yunus, L. (2017). Factors affecting the behavior of farmers toward the risk of seaweed farming in the Bungin Permai village, southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation & Legislation, 10(6), 1647-1653.

Fergiansyah, B. (2016). Analisis perbedaan kompetensi sosial dan intensi kewirausahaan antara mahasiswa etnis Jawa dan etnis Madura di Universitas Brawijaya. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 4(2), 1-11.

Jumare, H., Visser, M., & Brick, K. (2018). Risk preferences and the poverty trap: a look at technology uptake amongst smallholder farmers in the Matzikama Municipality. Working Papers-Economic Research Southern Africa, (725).

Kesek, M. P., & Tarore, M. L. (2017). Perbedaan pendapatan petani padi sawah antara etnis lokal dan non lokal di daerah irigasi Sangkub Kabupaten Bolaang Mongondow Utara. Agri-Sosioekonomi, 13(1A), 67-76.

Liu, E. M. (2013). Time to change what to sow: Risk preferences and technology adoption decisions of cotton farmers in China. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(4), 1386-1403.

Nashori, H. F., Nurdin, M. N., Herawati, N., Diana, R. R., & Masturah, A. N. (2020). Keterikatan interpersonal pada beberapa etnis besar di Indonesia. Jurnal psikologi sosial, 18(1), 53-63.

Sasmita, N., & Endang Widuatie, R. (2015). Pendhalungan â€bentuk asimilasi kultural Madura dan Jawa di Jemberâ€. Repository Universitas Jember.

Timur, W. K. J. P. J., & Gianawati15, N. D. (2015). Strategi dan makna bertahan hidup perempuan pedesaan etnis Madura dan Jawa (Kajian pada Perempuan Pedesaan etnis Madura di Desa Sumbersalak Kecamatan Ledokombo dan etnis Jawa di Desa Tanjungrejo Kecamatan. Gender dan Kemiskinan di Indonesia, 159.

Ullah, R., Shivakoti, G. P., & Ali, G. (2015). Factors affecting farmers’ risk attitude and risk perceptions: the case of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 13, 151-157.

Waduge TD, Edirisinghe JC, Fernando APS, Herath HMLK, Jayasinghe-Mudalige UK (2015) Labour and weather related risks in smallholder rubber production: evidence from Kalutara district. Tropical Agricultural Research and Extension, 16(3), 88-92.

Downloads

Published

10-08-2023

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2023)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright Notice

The author sends the manuscript with the understanding that if accepted for publication, the copyright of the article belongs to the author and retains publishing rights without restriction.

Copyright includes the non-exclusive right to reproduce and submit articles in all forms and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilm, and other similar reproductions, as well as translations. Reproduction of any part of this journal, its storage in the database and its transmission by all forms of media, such as electronic, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopying, recording, magnetic media, etc.

The journal editorial board makes every effort to ensure that no false or misleading data, opinions, or statements are published in the journal. Either way, the contents of articles and advertisements published in journals are the sole and exclusive responsibility of each writer and advertiser.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)