Integration of Design for X (DfX) and Value Engineering (VE) Methods for Product Redesign to Improve Productivity (Case study: L-Series production at PT. XYZ)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35891/9a9xwp87Keywords:
Design for X (DfX), Cost Reduction, Product Redesign, Increase Productivity, Safety Risk, Value Engineering (VE).Abstract
The increasingly intense global competition in the manufacturing sector has compelled companies to continuously improve productivity through the optimization of product design and production processes. The L-Series design manufactured by PT. XYZ exhibits inefficiencies and ineffectiveness, particularly in the design of the connection support and bottom sheet. The existing design requires complex manufacturing and assembly processes, resulting in high production costs and potential safety hazards for operators. To address these challenges, this study proposes a product redesign approach by integrating Design for X (DfX) principles, comprising Design for Manufacturing (DfM), Design for Assembly (DfA), and Design for Safety (DfS), with Value Engineering (VE). The redesign of the connection support and bottom sheet reduces the average production time by 22.96 minutes per unit and provides a potential production cost saving of IDR 16,834,120.03 per month. Furthermore, the proposed redesign eliminates the potential hazards associated with the welding process and prevents the previously identified risk of hand-crushing accidents during the manufacturing and assembly processes. These results demonstrate that the integrated DfX–VE approach can effectively improve manufacturing efficiency, reduce production costs, and enhance operator safety while maintaining the functional requirements of the product.
Downloads
References
Butt, J., & Jedi, S. (2020). Redesign of an in-market conveyor system for manufacturing cost reduction and design efficiency using dfma methodology. Designs, 4(1), 1–57. https://doi.org/10.3390/designs4010006
Formentini, G., Boix, N., & Claudio, R. (2022). Design for manufacturing and assembly methods in the product development process of mechanical products : a systematic literature review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 4307–4334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-022-08837-6
Gebisa, A. W., & Lemu, H. G. (2017). Design for manufacturing to design for Additive Manufacturing: Analysis of implications for design optimality and product sustainability. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 724–731. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.120
Hartanto, A., Ginting, R., & Ishak, A. (2024). Integration of Value Engineering for Design for Assembly in Product Design: A Comprehensive of Literature Review. Jurnal Sistem Teknik Industri, 26(2), 145–151. https://doi.org/10.32734/jsti.v26i2.15268
He, F. (2016). The Application of Value Analysis in the Product Redesign. (Icadme), 253–256. https://doi.org/10.2991/icadme-16.2016.37
Nurcahyanie, Y. D., & Rohmadiani, L. D. (2023). Design For Longevity and Design For X: Concepts, Applications, and Perspectives. Tibuana, 6(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.36456/tibuana.6.1.6596.58-64
Teo, A. L. E., Ofori, G., Tjandra, I. K., & Kim, H. (2016). Design for safety: Theoretical framework of the safety aspect of BIM system to determine the safety index. Construction Economics and Building, 16(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v16i4.4873
Yang, A. F., Produktivitas, M., & Mataram, U. (2024). EKONOBIS. 10(1), 73–84.
Zendrato, P., Surya, M., Mendrofa, D., Telaumbanua, A., & Iman, J. B. (2025). Management Perspective : Jurnal Penelitian Manajemen Original Article Pengaruh Perancangan Desain Produk Terhadap Efisiensi Waktu di Pusat. 2(1), 1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fatkhur Roji

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright is fully owned by the author without restrictions.








