The financial feasibility analysis of seaweed product at ora food MSMEs in Yogyakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35891/agx.v16i2.6145Keywords:
seaweed chips, profitability analysis, financial feasibility, fisheries productAbstract
Introduction: Diversification of processed seaweed products aims to respond to changes in consumer preferences, reach a broader market, and reduce the risk of dependence on one particular product type. In addition, product diversification can also be a practical innovation in increasing public interest in fishery products. One is the Ora Food MSMEs Yogyakarta, which is in the form of seaweed chips. Business feasibility is needed in a company's progress, and it is an analysis carried out on agencies on a particular project to provide direction as to whether investment in the project is feasible or not. Therefore, this study aims to analyze financial feasibility and business sensitivity in Ora Food MSMEs. Methods: Profitability analysis (BEP, profit, R/C and RTC), financial feasibility (NPV, B/C, IRR and PP) and business sensitivity analysis. Results: Profitability analysis, namely BEP sales of Rp. 119,324,566 or selling as many as 6,609 pcs with the product that must be sold the most on the regular spicy seaweed chips product (BEPq KRLBP ) a total of 3,182 pcs R/C = 2.18 (>1), RTC = 95.42% (>6%) then financial feasibility is NPV = Rp. 747,908,878,- (NPV positive) Net B/C = 3.62 (>1) and IRR = 65% (>6%) and payback period = 1.65 years. Furthermore, the business sensitivity analysis uses three scenarios, namely (1) Costs increase (138%), benefits remain the same, (2) Costs remain the same, benefits decrease (41%), and (3) Costs increase (56%), Benefits decrease (31%). Conclusion: The results of the financial feasibility analysis show that the business is profitable in the short term and financially feasible. In the sensitivity analysis, it can be concluded that the company is quite sensitive if there is a decrease in benefits but is not sensitive to increasing costs. Therefore, sales are expected to be constant at current production or improved by using optimised social media online marketing to reach a larger market.
References
Abidin, Z., Utomo, W. S., Puspitasari, H. P., Zahra, N. M., Waluyo, E., & Intyas, C. A. (2022). Mina Bisnis Olahan Rumput Laut. Universitas Brawijaya Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=2DegEAAAQBAJ
Agustang, Mulyani, S., & Indrawati, E. (2021). Budidaya Rumput laut potensi perairan kabupaten sinjai sulawesi selatan. In Pustaka Almaida.
BI. (2024). Statistic Indicator Rate. https://www.bi.go.id/id/statistik/indikator/bi-rate.aspx
Campo, S. R., & Zuniga Jara, S. (2018). Reviewing capital cost estimations in aquaculture. Aquaculture Economics and Management, 22(1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2017.1300839
Dewi Surya, I., Intyas, C. A. (2022). Analisis profitabilitas usaha tahu tuna krispi “tatuchi” di kecamatan lowokwaru, kota malang. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pesisir, 3(2), 1. http://www.sep.ejournal.unri.ac.id
Fatonny, N., Nurmalina, R., & Fariyanti, A. (2023). Analisis sistem agribisnis rumput laut di kabupaten takalar provinsi sulawesi selatan. Forum Agribisnis, 13(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.29244/fagb.13.1.35-49
Fauzi, P. M., Chumaidiyah, E., & Suryana, N. (2019). Analisis kelayakan serta perancangan aplikasi website pada startup digital creative fotografi berdasarkan aspek pasar, aspek teknis, dan aspek finansial. Jurnal INTECH Teknik Industri Universitas Serang Raya, 5(2), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.30656/intech.v5i2.1589
Gaurahman, F., & Arka, I. N. P. (2020). Analisis pengaruh sektor perikanan terhadap petumbuhan ekonomi di kabupaten mimika. JURNAL KRITIS (Kebijakan, Riset, Dan Inovasi), 4(1), 18–37. https://ejournal.stiejb.ac.id/index.php/jurnal-kritis/article/view/10
Gray, C., Simanjuntak, P., Sabur, L. K., Maspaitella, P. F. L., & Varley, R. C. G. (1992). Pengantar Evaluasi Proyek. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Gumilar, I., Saputra, A., Anggraeni, S. R., Pratama, R. I., & Maulina, I. (2024). Prospective analysis of seaweed processing downstream business: a case study in lontar village. Jurnal Ilmiah Platax, 12(2), 110–122. https://doi.org/10.35800/jip.v12i2.56118
Intyas, C. A., & Primyastanto, M. (2020). Marketing mix development analysis of preserved mackarel tuna (Euthynnes affinis) on customer satisfaction in Malang, East Java, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 493(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/493/1/012043
Intyas, C. A., Putritamara, J. A., & Haryati, N. (2022). Dinamika Agrobisnis Era VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, Ambiguity). Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Intyas, C. A., Tjahjono, A., & Fattah, M. (2019). Financial feasibility analysis of small-scale fish smoking by fisherman in home industries. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 96(12), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2019-12.22
Irzal, E., & Oktariza, W. (2006). Manajemen Agribisnis Perikanan. Penebar Swadaya.
KKP Statistics. (2022). Produksi Perikanan Rumput Laut di D.I Yogyakarta.
Laapo, A., Hasanuddin, A., & Tombolotutu, A. D. (2022). Leverage factors affecting the sustainability of seaweed agro-industry development in central sulawesi, indonesia. Agraris, 8(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.18196/agraris.v8i1.11525
M Nazir. (2003). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Muktiadji, N., & Sastra, H. (2013). Analisis modal kerja dan pengaruhnya terhadap pertumbuhan perusahaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 1(3), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v1i3.271
Mulyati, H., & Geldermann, J. (2017). Managing risks in the Indonesian seaweed supply chain. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 19(1), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1219-7
Murdiono, J., Winarsih, S., Louise Panggabean, H., & Sani, I. (2023). Funding for msmes selling seaweed on export destination coast. Siber Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 1(2), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.38035/sjtl.v1i2.73
Oraee, K., Sayadi, A. R., & Tavassoli, S. M. M. (2011). Economic evaluation and sensitivity-risk analysis of Zarshuran gold mine project. SME Annual Meeting and Exhibit and CMA 113th National Western Mining Conference 2011, 1–6.
Prayetno, E., Mirnawati, Rahayu, M. A., & Susilo, A. (2025). The innovation of seaweed processing process into chips as a local food superior product. Jurnal Al Maesarah, 4(1), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.58988/jam.v4i1.382
Putra, D. A. S., & Intyas, C. A. (2022). Analisis finansial usaha pembesaran udang vaname (litopenaeus vannamei) pada tambak intensif di pt. mitra raya cemerlang, kabupaten probolinggo. NEKTON: Jurnal Perikanan Dan Ilmu Kelautan, 2(2), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.47767/nekton.v2i2.382
Rangkuti, F. (2012). Studi Kelayakan Bisnis & Investasi. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Rimmer, M. A., Larson, S., Lapong, I., Purnomo, A. H., Pong‐masak, P. R., Swanepoel, L., & Paul, N. A. (2021). Seaweed aquaculture in indonesia contributes to social and economic aspects of livelihoods and community wellbeing. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(19), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910946
Rini Pratiwi, S. (2022). Green business strategy for the processed seaweed msmes (case study at tarakan city coastal). Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 2(5), 916–924. https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v2i05.452
Riyanto, B. (2010). Dasar Dasar Pembelanjaan Perusahaan. BPFE Yogyakarta.
Soekartawi, Soeharjo, A., Hardaker, J. B., & Dillon, J. L. (1986). Ilmu Usahatani dan Penelitian untuk Pengembangan Petani Kecil. Universitas Indonesia Press.
Syafril, M., Purnamasari, E., & Fidhiani, D. D. (2022). Analisis kelayakan finansial usaha perikanan tangkap di Kampung Gurimbang Kecamatan Sambaliung Kabupaten Berau. Agromix, 13(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.35891/agx.v13i1.2913
Wendin, K., & Undeland, I. (2020). Seaweed as food – Attitudes and preferences among swedish consumers. A pilot study. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 22(September), 100265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2020.100265
Zheng, Q., Davis, C. V., Noll, A. L., Bernier, R., & Labbe, R. (2024). US consumer preferences and attitudes toward seaweed and value-added products. Agribusiness, 40(3), 699–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21915
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Candra Intyas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The author sends the manuscript with the understanding that if accepted for publication, the copyright of the article belongs to the author and retains publishing rights without restriction.
Copyright includes the non-exclusive right to reproduce and submit articles in all forms and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilm, and other similar reproductions, as well as translations. Reproduction of any part of this journal, its storage in the database and its transmission by all forms of media, such as electronic, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopying, recording, magnetic media, etc.
The journal editorial board makes every effort to ensure that no false or misleading data, opinions, or statements are published in the journal. Either way, the contents of articles and advertisements published in journals are the sole and exclusive responsibility of each writer and advertiser.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Download Template
