The role of the madura cattle-field crops integration system model in increasing farmers' income

Authors

  • Hopid Hopid Universitas Wiraraja
  • Ribut Santosa Universitas Wiraraja
  • Sindi Arista Rahman Universitas Wiraraja
  • Amir Hamzah Universitas Wiraraja
  • Darma Jasuli Universitas Wiraraja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35891/3k6svv68

Keywords:

Integration, Madura cattle, Field crops, Farmers' Income

Abstract

Introduction: The integration between cattle farming and agricultural crops has long been known as a strategy to improve efficiency in the use of natural resources. The cattle-crop integration system model enables synergy between these two sectors and plays a significant role in increasing farmer income in Madura. This research aims to analyze the role of the Madura cattle-field crop integration model in increasing farmer income. Methods: Samples were selected using purposive sampling technique, with criteria for farmers who have implemented the integration system for at least five years. The sample size was determined based on the availability of data that could be obtained and statistical analysis needs. The analysis method used Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS). This design was chosen because SEM-PLS can handle latent variables and test relationships between variables simultaneously. Results: The analysis results show that both cattle maintenance and field crop management contribute significantly to increasing farmer income, with path coefficient values of 0.392 and 0.502 respectively, and T-statistic values > 1.96 (p-value < 0.05). Conclusion: An R² value of 0.370 indicates that about 37% of farmers' income variations are explained by this integrated system, while the rest is influenced by external factors outside the model, this result is strong enough to illustrate the strategic role of the integration model in sustainable agribusiness systems.

References

Abdoun, K. A., Al-Sagan, A. A., Altahir, O., Suliman, G. M., Al-Haidary, A. A., & Alsaiady, M. Y. (2022). Cultivation and uses of Moringa oleifera as non-conventional feed stuff in livestock production: A review. Life, 13(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13010063

Al-Rikabi, A. G. H., Sumari, P. B., & Younis, H. A. (2024). Continued usage intention of mobile learning (m-learning) in Iraqi universities under an unstable environment: Integrating the ECM and UTAUT2 models. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 19, 3. https://doi.org/10.28945/5250

Amad, A. A., & Zentek, J. (2023). The use of Moringa oleifera in ruminant feeding and its contribution to climate change mitigation. Frontiers in Animal Science, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2023.1137562

Appiah-Twumasi, M., & Asale, M. A. (2022). Crop diversification and farm household food and nutrition security in Northern Ghana. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(1), 157–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02703-x

Aswar, R. N., Ihsannudin, I., & Hasan, F. (2022). Kontribusi usahatani cabe jamu terhadap pendapatan keluarga petani di Desa Pakandangan Sangra Kecamatan Bluto Kabupaten Sumenep. Agriscience, 3(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.21107/agriscience.v3i1.15149

Azine, P. C., Mugumaarhahama, Y., Mutwedu, V. B., Baenyi, S. P., Kunde, E. A., Mwanga, J.-C. I. M., Bacigale, S. B., Katcho, K., & Ayagirwe, R. B.-B. (2024). Livestock feeding practices in South Kivu, eastern Democratic Republic of Congo: Challenges and opportunities. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4790505/v1

Bonewati, Y. I., Farid, M., Herni, H., Agustan, A., & Hamka, H. (2024). The implication of artificial insemination technology on farmers’ willingness to adopt beef cattle in Soppeng Regency. Buletin Peternakan, 48(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.21059/buletinpeternak.v48i1.88828

de Albuquerque Nunes, P. A., Laca, E. A., de Faccio Carvalho, P. C., Li, M., de Souza Filho, W., Robinson Kunrath, T., Posselt Martins, A., & Gaudin, A. (2021). Livestock integration into soybean systems improves long-term system stability and profits without compromising crop yields. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1649. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81270-z

Dhehibi, B., Fouzaï, A., Frija, A., Adhim, M. A., M’hamed, H. C., Ouerghemmi, H., & Rekik, M. (2023). Assessing complementary synergies for integrated crop–livestock systems under conservation agriculture in Tunisian dryland farming systems. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2022.1022213

Ediset, E., Jaswandi, J., Madarisa, F., Anas, A., & Rizqan, R. (2024). Artificial insemination (AI) innovation adoption rate on buffalo farm business in Padang Pariaman Regency, West Sumatra. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2024/12.4.768.774

Grinnell, N. A., van der Linden, A., Azhar, B., Nobilly, F., & Slingerland, M. (2022). Cattle–oil palm integration: A viable strategy to increase Malaysian beef self-sufficiency and palm oil sustainability. Livestock Science, 259, 104902.

Hopid, H., & Rahman, S. A. (2025). Nilai ekonomi dan manfaat pemeliharaan sapi Madura upaya meningkatkan penghasilan petani. Mimbar Agribisnis, 11(1), 1403–1410. https://doi.org/10.25157/ma.v11i1.17089

Icahyaningrum, E., Kusmartono, K., Mashudi, M., & Ndaru, P. H. (2024). Optimizing performance of Madura cattle in smallholder farms in Bangkalan Madura. BIO Web of Conferences, 88, 44. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20248800044

Imran, S., Indriani, R., & Hippy, M. Z. (2025). Optimization of sustainable corn–cattle integration in Gorontalo Province using goal programming. Open Agriculture, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0405

Marwaty, R. S., Ihsan, M., Wisaptiningsih, U., & Suyadi, S. (2022). Increasing the economic value of beef cattle business waste in the integration system with food crops in Gorontalo Regency, Indonesia. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 121(1), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.18551/rjoas.2022-01.22

Mekonnen, K., Bezabih, M., Thorne, P. S., Gebreyes, M., Hammond, J., & Adie, A. (2021). Feed and forage development in mixed crop–livestock systems of the Ethiopian highlands: Africa RISING project research experience. Agronomy Journal, 114(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20853

Mohammadi, M., Samizadeh, M., Pouya, S., & Arabahmadi, R. (2023). Examining the mediating effect of knowledge management on the relationship between organizational culture and organizational performance. Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics, 1(1), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.31181/jscda1120235

Novra, A., Fatati, F., Devitriano, D., & Syarif, S. R. (2023). Compost fertilizer business supply chain management strategy for stability of potential added value of waste raw materials in Jambi Province, Indonesia. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 23(3), 22670–22693. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.118.21625

Prameswari, W., Herman, W., & Salamah, U. (2021). Growth of long pepper (Piper retrofractum Vahl.) with different growing media composition. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(3), 345–350. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.3.345-350

Pratomo, A. B., Harahap, M. A. K., Oswari, T., Akhirianto, P. M., & Widarman, A. (2023). The application of end user computing satisfaction (EUCS) to analyze the satisfaction of MyPertamina users. Jurnal Sistim Informasi dan Teknologi, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.37034/jsisfotek.v5i1.205

Priantara, I. K. T. A. D., & Utama, R. A. (2025). Implementasi kebijakan pemerintah dalam mendorong sistem pertanian organik sebagai transformasi pertanian berkelanjutan masa depan di Bali. Journal of Citizenship, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.31506/joc.v4i1.543

Sarstedt, M., & Liu, Y. (2023). Advanced marketing analytics using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Journal of Marketing Analytics, 12(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-023-00279-7

Shanmugam, P. M., Sangeetha, S. P., Prabu, P. C., Varshini, S. V., Renukadevi, A., Ravisankar, N., Parasuraman, P., Parthipan, T., Satheeshkumar, N., & Natarajan, S. K. (2024). Crop–livestock-integrated farming system: A strategy to achieve synergy between agricultural production, nutritional security, and environmental sustainability. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8, 1338299. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1338299

Sugandi, D., Purnamasari, N. R., Nurawan, A., Sutrisna, N., & Surdianto, Y. (2023). System proximity index ratio (SPIR) accuracy in forecasting the sustainability of crop–livestock farming systems in Indonesian paddy fields. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 62(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2022.270959

Sugiarti, T., Arifiyanti, N., Purnamasari, M., & Huang, W. (2022). Capacity development of Madurese female farmers in the implementation of integrated crop management in corn. Agriekonomika, 11(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.21107/agriekonomika.v11i2.14932

Suhartini, S., Suparlan, S., & Suwardji, S. (2022). Integration of sorghum, porang, and cow livestock as an effort to increase farmers’ income and soil quality in dry land. Path of Science, 8(6), 5007–5011. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.82-13

Triono, M. A. A., Rukmana, D., & Rahmadanih, R. (2024). Productivity and farmers’ income in rice plant crop–cattle integration farming system in Lera Village, Wotu Sub-District, East Luwu District. International Journal of Religion, 5(10), 2045–2053. https://doi.org/10.61707/rke7qb94

Wantasen, E., Elly, F. H., Umboh, S. J. K., Santa, N. M., & Leke, J. R. (2024). Optimization of integrated farming resources to increase farmers’ income: A case study in Indonesia. Journal of Agricultural Sciences – Sri Lanka, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.4038/jas.v19i1.9953

Yusriadi, Y., Junus, D., Wijayanti, R., Hasnawati, H., & Cahaya, A. (2024). Perspectives of rural farmer households on food security through a qualitative study in Indonesia. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, 24(2), 25450–25467. https://doi.org/10.18697/ajfand.127.23510

Zenda, M. (2025). Climate change adaptation and mitigation in different livestock production systems and agro-ecological zones in South Africa: A systematic review. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 57(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-025-04660-9

Downloads

Published

23-03-2026