Main Article Content

Muhammad Hermansyah

The implementation of raw material selection is a multicriteria problem where each criterion used has a different importance and the information about it is not known with certainty. Selection of suppliers based on low price bids is no longer efficient in obtaining maximum performance, SCM must combine other criteria that are relevant to company objectives. PT. X faces obstacles related to unstable supplier performance, including delays, fluctuating prices and delivery that is not in accordance with the orders. The instability that occurs is not yet due to other factors that tend to be far from the company's plans and estimates.This research approach uses the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in the decision-making support process of a complex and measurable problem uses fuzzy to accommodate the uncertainty that occurs when making decisions. Based on the results of calculations that have been carried out using the Fuzzy AHP combination method and the assessment using the rating scale, the calculation results of each criterion in this study are obtained with the quality criteria of 0.2829, delivery criteria 0.2096, price criteria 0.1457, service criteria 0 , 0984, the criteria for production capability 0.1466, and the criteria for supplier characteristics 0.1172. Based on these calculations, the quality criteria are the top priority in selecting suppliers, especially in the supply of cement raw materials.

Keywords: Supplier selection; FAHP; cement raw material.
. Hermansyah, Muhammad.Pendampingan Masyarakat Kampung Olahan Hasil Tambak Berbasis Jaringan Komunikasi (Kajian Ekonomi Masyarakat Kelurahan Kalianyar, Bangil, Pasuruan). Pasuruan : Soeropati, 2018. 25.
2. Supplier Segmentation using fuzzy preference relations based AHP (Case study: Fouman Shimi). Azar, Adel, Hemmatinezhad, MehrAli and Alijani, Ehya. 6, 2015, Journal of Current Research in Science, Vol. 3, p. 1.
3. Dalih Iskandar, Muhammad Hermansyah.Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process. Pasuruan : JKIE (Journal Knowledge Industrial Engineering), 2020. 92.
4. Fuzzy AHP as a tool for prioritization of key performance indicators. Kaganski, Sergei, Majak, Juri and Karjust, Kristo. 2018, 2018, International Journal of Manufacturing System, Vol. 72, pp. 1227-1232.
5. A Proposed Operational Risk Management Framework for Small and Medium Enterprises. Naude, Micheline J and Chiweshe, Nigel. 1, 2017, South African Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, Vol. 20, pp. 1-10.
6. Gaplek Based Tapioca System using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) Approach. Hermansyah , Muhammad, et al., et al. 5, 2020, International Journal of Advanced Science and Technologhy, Vol. 20, pp. 5594-5606.
7. Dagun, Save M.Kamus besar ilmu pengetahuan. Jakarta : Lembaga Pengkajian Kebudayaan Nusantara (LPKN), 2000. 1600.
8. Sri Kusumadewi, Hari Purnomo.Aplikasi Logika Fuzzy untuk pendukung keputusan. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu, 2004. 100.
9. Saaty, Thomas L.Pengambilan keputusan bagi para pemimpin. Bengkulu : Pustaka binaman prasindo, 1993. 12.
10. Hermansyah, Muhammad.Analisis Pelaksanaan Penjadwalan Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Clubhouse Dengan Pendekatan Cpm Dan Pert Pada PT. XY. Pandaan : JKIE (Journal Knowledge Industrial Engineering), 2018. 30.
11. Wang, Hong‐Da.Debt Financing and Earnings Management: An Internal Capital Market Perspective. Africa : Wiley, 2013. 842.
12. Application and Development of a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process within a Capital Investment Study. Tang, Yu Cheng and Beynon, Malcolm J. 2, 2005, Journal of Economics and Management, Vol. 1, pp. 207-230.
13. Optimalisasi supply chain management produk olahan ikan hasil tangkap di era industri 4.0. Misbah, Ahmad and Muyasaroh, Hikmatul Faizah. 2, 2019, Vol. 10, pp. 152-162.
14. Dubois, D and Prade , H.Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications . New York : Kluwer Academic, 1980.
15. Dagun, Save M.Kamus Besar Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jakarta : Lembaga Pengkajian Kebudayaan Nusantara (LPKN), 2006. p. 185.
16. Kusumadewi, Sri and Purnomo, H.Aplikasi Logika Fuzzy: Untuk Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu, 2004.
17. Validation of Performance Measures for Green Supllier Selecetion in Indian Industries. Samadhan, Deshmukh. 3, 2013, International Journal of Modern Engineering Research (IJMER), Vol. 3, pp. 1617-1622.
18. The Total Cost of Logistic in Supplier Selection, under Conditions of Multiple Sourching, Multiple Criteria and Capacity Constrains. Ghodsypour, Sysed Hassan and O'Brien, Christopher. 2001, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 73, pp. 15-27.
19. Intelligent Evaluation of Supplier Bids Using a Hybrid Technique in Distributed Supply Chains. Soroor, Javad, et al., et al. 2012, International Journal of Manufacturing System, Vol. 31, pp. 240-252.
20. Reason, James.Human Error. s.l. : Ashgate, 1990.
21. Suharnan.Psikologi Kognitif. Surabaya : Srikandi, 2005.
22. Rakhmat, Jalaluddin.Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung : Rosdakarya, 2007.
23. Hasan, Muhammad Iqbal.Pokok-pokok Materi Pengambilan Keputusan . Bogor : Ghalia Indonesia , 2004.
24. Syamsi, Ibnu.Pengambilan Keputusan dan Sistem Informasi. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara, 2000.
25. Salusu, J.Pengambilan Keputusan Stratejik: Untuk Organisasi Publik dan Organisasi Nonprofit. s.l. : Grasindo, 2004.
26. Turban , E.Decission Support Systems and Expert Systems . New Jersey : Prentice Hall International Inc, 1995.
27. Management Decission: The Essence of Management Decission. Harrison , E. Frank and Pelletier, Monique A. 7, 2000, Management Decission, Vol. 38, pp. 462-470.
28. Kusumadewi , S.Artificial Intelegence (Teknik dan Aplikasinya). Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu, 2003.
29. Pembuatan sistem Pendukung Keputusan Berbasis Teori Fuzzy Untuk Mengembangkan Produk Baru. Wulandari, F. 2005, Jurnal Sains, Teknologi & Industri 2, pp. 62-66.
30. Saaty, Thomas L.Pengambilan Keputusan Bagi Para Pemimpin: Proses Hirarki Analitik untuk Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Situasi yang Kompleks. s.l. : Pustaka Binaan Pressindo, 1993.
31. Comparison of AHP and Fuzzy AHP for The Multi-Criteria Decision Making Process with Linguistic Evaluations. Ozdagoglu, Askin and Ozdagoglu, Guzin. 11, 2007, Vol. 6, pp. 65-85.
32. Marimin.Teknik dan Aplikasi Pengambilan Keputusan Kriteria Majemuk. s.l. : Grasindo, 2005.
33. Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process for evaluating and selecting a vendor in a supply chain model. Haq, Noorul A and Kannan, G. 29, 2006, International Journal of Adv Manufacture Technology, pp. 862-835.
34. Kaufmann, Arnold and Gupta, M M.Fuzzy Mathematics Models in Engineering and Management Science. North Holland : Elsevier Science Publisher, 1988.
35. Multicriteria Analysis with Fuzzy Pairwise Comparison. Deng, Hepu. 1999, International Journal Approximate Reasoning, Vol. 21, pp. 215-231.
36. Salusu, J.Pengambilan Keputusan Stratejik: Untuk Organisasi Publik dan Organisasi Nonprofit. s.l. : Grasindo, 2004.
37. Models, Methods, Concepts, & Applications of the analytic hierarchy process. 2000.
38. Saaty, Thomas L and Vargas , L G.Models, Methods, Concepts, & Applications of the analytic hierarchy process . 2000.
39. —. Models, Methods, Concepts, & Applications of the analytic hierarchy process. 2000.
40. A Fuzzy AHP aproach to personnel selection problem. Gungor, Zulal, Serhadlioglu, Gurkan dan Kesen, Saadettin Erhan. 2009, International Journal of Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 9, hal. 641-646.