Identification of supply chain risks in the tobacco products industry in Pasuruan Regency using the supply chain operations reference (SCOR) and house of risk (HoR) model approaches
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35891/agx.v15i1.4123Keywords:
risk mitigation, supply chain, tobacco products industry, tobaccoAbstract
Introduction: This research aims to identify types of risks and sources of risks, analyze risk priority levels, and formulate mitigation strategies for the tobacco products industry supply chain in Pasuruan Regency. Methods: This research was conducted at the tobacco products industry PT. XZ in Pasuruan Regency. Respondents focused on company managers (focal firms), namely product development, raw material management, research and development pilot plant and tobacco clue management who knew about supply chain risks. Supply chain network integration uses a snowball method approach. Data collection methods use primary and secondary data. At the interview stage, the Delphi method was used to identify risk events and risk sources. Furthermore, the results of the interview were identified using the Supply Chain Operation Reverence (SCOR) and House of Risk (HoR) models. Results: There are 39 risk events and risk agents in the IHT in Pasuruan Regency. There are eight risk priority levels for tobacco supply chain risk agents using the SCOR approach and the Pareto diagram, namely workers not paying attention, problems with machines, high rainfall/high rainfall, production machines need to be repaired, workers' skills are not good, production machines are old, handling bad goods, and errors in the machine. Conclusion: The results of the IHT supply chain risk mitigation strategy formulation are tightening the use of work SOPs, checking production machines regularly, strengthening information between agents and factories, checking machines every 4 hours, conducting worker training, using Google Maps technology in delivering goods, cleaning machines, maintaining product quality, drying/air-drying tobacco leaves, improving quality control during transactions with farmers, and increasing coordination with the Government.
References
Abrori, F. (2017). Identifikasi dan pengelolaan risiko rantai pasok rumah produksi tahu apu dengan metode house of risk. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Apriyani, D., Nurmalina, R., & Burhanuddin. (2018). Evaluasi kinerja rantai pasok sayuran organik dengan pendekatan Supply Chain Operation Reference (SCOR). Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 8(2), 312–335. https://dx.doi.org/10.22441/mix.2018.v8i2.008312
Asrol, M., Marimin, Machfud, Yani, M., & Taira, E. (2021). Risk management for improving supply chain performance of sugarcane agroindustry. Industrial Engineering & Management Systems, 20(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.7232/iems.2021.20.1.9
Bannor, R. K., Oppong-Kyeremeh, H., Amfo, B., Kuwornu, J. K. M., Kyire, S. C. K., & Amponsah, J. (2023). Agricultural insurance and risk management among poultry farmers in Ghana: an application of discrete choice experiment. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100492
Bier, T., Lange, A., & Glock, C. H. (2020). Methods for mitigating disruptions in complex supply chain structures: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 58(6), 1835-1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1687954
Bowo, D. S. (2018). Analisis perbaikan proses produksi pada PT Sumber Teknik Sentosa. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 8(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.22219/jmb.v8i1.7049
Butdee, S., & Phuangsalee, P. (2019). Uncertain risk assessment modeling for bus body manufacturing supply chain using AHP and fuzzy AHP. Procedia Manufacturing, 30, 663–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.02.094
Direktorat Jendel Bea dan Cukai. (2019). Laporan kinerja Direktorat Jenderal Bea dan Cukai Kementerian Keuangan 2019. Jakarta
Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: a literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), 5031–5069. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467
Islam, T., Khan, S. A., & Sakib, A. (2017). Analysis of major defects position and percentage in sewing lines of a garments factory with the help of a Pareto chart, cause-effect diagram, and sigma level. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 8(7), 1885–1890.
Khan, R. U., Salamzadeh, Y., Iqbal, Q., & Yang, S. (2020). The impact of customer relationship management and company reputation on customer loyalty: the mediating role of customer satisfaction. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 21(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332667.2020.1840904
Kraude, R., Narayanan, S., & Talluri, S. (2022). Evaluating the performance of supply chain risk mitigation strategies using network data envelopment analysis (forthcoming). European Journal of Operational Research, 303(3), 1168–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.03.016
Kurniawan, S., Marzuky, D., Ryanto, R., & Agustine, V. (2021). Risk and Supply Chain Mitigation Analysis Using House of Risk Method and Analytical Network Process (A Case Study on Palm Oil Company). The Winners, 22(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v22i2.7056
Kusrini, E., Safitri, K. N., & Fole, A. (2022). Mitigasi risiko di distribusi sustainable supply chain management menggunakan metode House of Risk (HOR). Integrasi Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Industri, 7(1), 14–23. http://jurnal.um-palembang.ac.id/index.php/integrasi
Maulidah, S. (2020). Risk mitigation of tobacco supply chain: business process model. HABITAT, 31(3), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.habitat.2020.031.3.18
Melly, S., Hadiguna, R. A., Santosa, & Nofialdi. (2019). Manajemen risiko rantai pasok agroindustri gula merah tebu di Kabupaten Agam, Provinsi Sumatera Barat. Industria: Jurnal Teknologi dan Manajemen Agroindustri, 8(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.industria.2019.008.02.6
Murniati, W., Kurnia, W. I., Handayani, S., & Ishak, S. (2019). Pengukuran kinerja supply chain pada industri UKM kerajinan (studi kasus: industri kerajinan ketak, Lombok Tengah, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia). Journal Of Industrial Engineering Management, 4(1), 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.33536/jiem.v4i1.262
Natanelov, V., Cao, S., Foth, M., & Dulleck, U. (2022). Blockchain smart contracts for supply chain finance: Mapping the innovation potential in Australia-China beef supply chains. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 30, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2022.100389
Ntabe, E., Lebel, L., Munson, A. D., & Santa-Eulalia, L. A. (2015). A systematic literature review of the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model application with special attention to environmental issues. Intern. Journal of Production Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.08.008
Nugroho, T. W., & Pariasa, I. I. (2017). Pengukuran kinerja manajemen rantai pasok kopi amstirdam di Kabupaten Malang dengan pendekatan SCOR (Supply Chain Operation Reference). In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pembangunan Pertanian II, 160–165.
Oehmen, J., Olechowski, A., Kenley, C. R., & Ben-Daya, M. (2014). Analysis of the effect of risk management practices on the performance of new product development programs. Technovation, 34(8), 441-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.12.005
Pujawan, I. N., & Geraldin, L. H. (2009). House of risk : a model for proactive supply chain risk management. Business Process Management Journal, 15(6), 953–967. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637150911003801
Putri, I. N. (2020). Analisis risiko kegagalan produk mempengaruhi kualitas pelayanan menggunakan house of risk dan supply chain operations reference. Jurnal Optimasi Teknik Industri, 2(1), 19–23.
Rantung, M. L., Adolfina, & Wenas, R. S. (2016). Analisis kinerja rantai pasok komoditas kacang tanah di pasar tradisional beriman kota Tomohon. Jurnal EMBA, 4(2), 849–858.
Rizqiah, E. (2017). Manajemen risiko supply chain dengan mempertimbangkan kepentingan stakeholder pada industri gula. Surabaya: Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember.
Saifuddin, & Fahrizal, A. (2020). Analisis produksi pendapatan dan kelayakan usahahatani tembakau (studi kasus Desa Palengaan Laok Kecamatan Palengaan Kabupaten Pamekasan). Al-Iqtishod Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 2(2), 149–170.
Savitri, R. L. (2022). Analisis dan mitigasi risiko rantai pasok pengecoran logam menggunakan metode house of risk (HOR) (studi kasus: PT. Mitra Rekatama Mandiri). Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Sihadi, I. P., Pangemanan, S. S., & Gamaliel, H. (2018). Identifikasi kendala dalam proses produksi dan dampaknya terhadap biaya produksi pada UD. Risky. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Going Concern, 13(4), 602–609.
Soleha, S. N. (2018). Peranan SOP dalam menciptakan efektivitas dan efisiensi kerja di hotel SR Bali. Tourism, Hospitality and Culinary Journal, 3(1), 67–73.
Sugathadasa, P. T. R. S., Perera, H. N., & Liyanage, A. K. (2020). Effective management of manufacturing supply chain risks: A Sri Lankan perspective. Engineer, LIII(3), 63–76. http://doi.org/10.4038/engineer.v53i3.7421
Sukwadi, R. (2013). Pengembangan model integrasi delphi-AHP-markov dalam perencanaan kebutuhan sumber daya manusia. Spektrum Industri, 11(2), 227–242.
Tirtosastro, S., & Musholaeni, W. (2015). Penangananpanen dan pasca panen tembakau di Kabupaten Bojonegoro. Buana Sains, 15(2), 155–164.
Ulfah, M. (2022). Mitigasi risiko rantai pasok industri kue menggunakan house of risk. Journal Industrial Services, 8(1), 63–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.36055/jiss.v8i1.14315
Zasadzien, M. (2014). Using the pareto diagram and FMEA (failure mode and effects analysis) to identify key defects in a product. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 4(16), 153–156. https://doi.org/10.12914/MSPEâ€02â€04â€2014
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
The author sends the manuscript with the understanding that if accepted for publication, the copyright of the article belongs to the author and retains publishing rights without restriction.
Copyright includes the non-exclusive right to reproduce and submit articles in all forms and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilm, and other similar reproductions, as well as translations. Reproduction of any part of this journal, its storage in the database and its transmission by all forms of media, such as electronic, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopying, recording, magnetic media, etc.
The journal editorial board makes every effort to ensure that no false or misleading data, opinions, or statements are published in the journal. Either way, the contents of articles and advertisements published in journals are the sole and exclusive responsibility of each writer and advertiser.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Download Template
