Comparative Analysis of Soybean Farming for Seeds and Consumption in the District of Grobogan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35891/7w4j1r66Keywords:
soybeans, comparative analysis, Grobogan District, seeds, consumptionAbstract
Introduction: As a tropical country, Indonesia has significant potential for soybean cultivation; however, national production for the 2017–2021 period still falls short of demand, and dependence on imports remains high, particularly in Grobogan District, which is the main production center in Central Java. Based on these conditions, this study aims to analyze the differences in profits, feasibility, and profitability of soybean farming for seeds and consumption in Grobogan District. Methods: This study employs both descriptive and analytical method, collecting primary and secondary data through surveys, observations, interviews, questionnaires, and records on 60 respondents selected by quota and purposive means in Grobogan District. The analysis was conducted by calculating implicit and explicit costs, revenue, profits, feasibility (R/C ratio), profitability, and comparative tests using an independent sample t-test. Results: The total cost of soybean farming for seeds in Grobogan District is Rp4.712.905/ha, with revenue of Rp6.962.166/ha resulting in a profit of Rp2.249.261/ha. The total cost of soybean farming for consumption in Grobogan District is Rp3.709.952/ha, with revenue of Rp5.027.700/ha resulting in a farming profit of Rp1.317.748/ha. The feasibility and profitability values of soybean farming for seeds are 1,62 and 0,62. The feasibility and profitability values of soybean farming for consumption are 1,47 and 0,47. The results of the independent sample t-test show a significant (2-tailed) value > 0.05, indicating that H0 is accepted and H1 is rejected, indicating that there is no statistically significant difference in profit, feasibility, and profitability between soybean farming for seeds and consumption. Conclusion: Soybean farming for seed and consumption is equally profitable and feasible, with higher values of income, profit, feasibility, and profitability in soybeans compared to seed production alone. However, the results of the independent sample t-test show a significance value greater than 0,05 for all three variables, indicating that statistically there is no significant difference between soybean farming for seeds and consumption in Grobogan District. The non-significant test results were due to the profits from soybean seed farming, which, although higher, were offset by higher total costs. The implementation of relatively uniform production mechanisms among farmers resulted in low data variation, as well as production risks due to the short seed storage life and decreased germination capacity.
References
Andayanie, W. R. (2016). Pengembangan produksi kedelai sebagai upaya kemandirian pangan di Indonesia. Mitra Wacana Media.
Anwar, M., Noor, T. I., & Sudrajat, S. (2019). Analisis perbandingan usaha tani kedelai polong muda dan polong tua. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Agroinfo Galuh, 6(3), 657. https://doi.org/10.25157/jimag.v6i3.2548
Anwar, M. U., Darsan, & Su’udi, D. (2018). Analisis pendapatan usahatani ketela pohon gajah (Manihot esculenta) studi kasus di Desa Tamanrejo Kecamatan Tunjungan Kabupaten Blora Propinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun Musim Tanam 2017. Jurnal Agribisnis dan Pertanian Berkelanjutan (ORYZA), 3(2), 24–30.
Azharini, R., Pradana, O. C. P., & Wahyuni, A. (2020). Umur simpan benih kedelai (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) varietas anjasmoro pada kondisi ruang simpan berbeda. Planta Simbiosa, 2(2), 53–63.
Barokah, U. (2011). Analisis biaya dan pendapatan usaha tani kedelai di Kabupaten Sukoharjo. Jurnal SEPA, 8(1), 9–13.
Bubun, B., Sukardi, S., & Suparno, O. (2018). Kinerja rantai pasok kedelai di Kabupaten Grobogan. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis dan Manajemen, 4(1), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.17358/jabm.4.1.32
Budiraharjo, K., Handayani, M., & Sanyoto, G. (2011). Analisis profitabilitas usaha penggemukan sapi potong di Kecamatan Gunungpati Kota Semarang. Mediagro, 7(1), 1–9.
Bwala, M., & Alani, W. (2020). Comparative profitability analysis of cowpea and soybean enterprises in Niger State of Nigeria. Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University, 18(2), 471-478. https://doi.org/10.5455/jbau.98958
Deokate, T. B., Yadav, J. P., Bandgar, D. P., & Ade, P. (2021). Comparative economics of seed production vs grain production of soybean in Washim District of Maharashtra. 10(1), 438–440.
Fadhullah, A. D., Ekowati, T., & Mukson. (2018). Analisis rantai pasok (supply chain) kedelai di UD Adem Ayem Kecamatan Pulokulon Kabupaten Grobogan. BISE: Jurnal Pendidikan Bisnis Dan Ekonomi, 4(2), 86–95. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/bise
Farikin, M., Saparto, & Suharyono, E. (2016). Analisis usaha tani kedelai varietas grobogan di Desa Pandanharum Kabupaten Grobogan. Agromedia, 34(1), 56–63.
Garbelini, L. G., Franchini, J. C., Debiasi, H., Balbinot Junior, A. A., Betioli Junior, E., & Telles, T. S. (2020). Diversified crop rotation systems and their benefits to soybean production and profitability. Agronomy Journal, 112(5), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20308.
Hulu, A. (2023). Studi inovasi strategi kebijakan percepatan pencapaian swasembada kedelai Indonesia tahun 2035. Matra Pembaruan, 7(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.21787/mp.7.1.2023.13-23
Irawan, W., Saridewi, L. P., & Anisya, A. P. M. (2022). Analisis Usaha tani Kedelai di Kecamatan Adimulyo Kabupaten Kebumen. Journal of Agribusiness Science and Rural Development, 2(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.32639/jasrd.v2i1.231
Issifah, S. (2025). Analisis usaha tani penangkaran benih kedelai ( Glycine Max ) varietas gepak ijo di Desa Belor Kecamatan Ngaringan Kabupaten Grobogan. Agromedia: Berkala Ilmiah Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian, 43(1), 1–9.
Kasim, S. (2004). Petunjuk menghitung keuntungan dan pendapatan. Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Lambung Mangkurat.
Kharisma, B. (2018). Determinan produksi kedelai di Indonesia dan implikasi kebijakannya. E-Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 3(1), 679–710.
Krisdiana, R., Adi, D., Elisabeth, A., Saeri, M., Darsani, Y. R., Burhansyah, R., ... & Harsono, A. (2024). Agribusiness analysis of seed producer supports increased soybean production in East Java production centre areas. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 22(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2024.2361581
Kurnia, R., Noor, T. I., Wulandari, E., & Rachmadi, M. (2019). Kelayakan usaha tani kedelai di lahan darat dan lahan sawah. Mimbar Agribisnis: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis, 5(2), 346. https://doi.org/10.25157/ma.v5i2.2390
Malika, U. E., & Adiwijaya, J. C. (2017). Peranan agribisnis susu sapi perah. Jurnal Agribisnis, 19(2), 155–161.
Maneku, A., Indriani, R., & Boekoesoe, Y. (2024). Analisis perbandingan pendapatan petani program READSI dan Non READSI di Desa Huntu Utara Kecamatan Bulango Selatan Kabupaten Bone Bolango. AGRINESIA: Jurnal Ilmiah Agribisnis, 12–19. https://doi.org/10.37046/agr.v0i0.18366
Nofita, I., Sutiarso, E., & Hadi, S. (2015). Analisis keuntungan usaha tani cabai merah besar di Desa Andongsari Kecamatan Ambulu Kabupaten Jember. Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pertanian, 13(2), 166–171.
Nuswardhani. (2017). Struktur biaya dan profitabilitas usaha tani tanaman pangan (padi, jagung, dan kedelai). Jurnal Agromix, 8(1), 64–74.
Kamali, F., Meuwissen, M. P. M., de Boer, I. J. M., van Middelaar, C. E., Moreira, A., & Oude Lansink, A. G. J. M. (2017). Evaluation of the environmental, economic, and social performance of soybean farming systems in southern Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.135
Ramdhan, M. (2021). Metode penelitian. Cipta Media Nusantara.
Rawung, J. B. M., Indrasti, R., Hutapea, R. T. P., & Sasmita, P. (2022). Analisis keunggulan komparatif, kompetitif, dan dampak kebijakan pengembangan usaha tani kedelai. Jurnal Penelitian Pertanian Tanaman Pangan, 5(3), 217. https://doi.org/10.21082/jpptp.v5n3.2021.p217-224
Riskawati, Sau, T., Rosadi, S. H., & Said, S. A. (2024). Analisis pupuk bersubsidi, pompanisasi, dan pestisida terhadap produktivitas padi ( Oryza Sativa l ) bagi petani. Jurnal Ilmiah Agrotani, 6(1), 47–56.
Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental Research Statistic for the Behavioral Sciences (Second edi). Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Rosyidah, M., & Fijra, R. (2021). Metode penelitian. Deepublish.
Sahir, S. H. (2022). Metode penelitian. Penerbit KBM Indonesia.
Salam, M., & Kamruzzaman, M. (2016). Comparative and competitive advantage of soybean cultivation in Noakhali and Laxmipur District of Bangladesh. Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University, 13(2), 265–272. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbau.v13i2.28798
Setyandari, W. A., Darsan, & Su’udi, D. (2018). Analisis perbandingan pendapatan usaha tani kedelai (Glycine max L) varietas grobogan dengan sistem tanam tugal dan sistem tanam sebar. Forum, 3(2), 13–18.
Sugiarto, I. (2022). Metodologi penelitian bisnis. Penerbit Andi.
Sukmaya, S. G., Rachmina, D., & Saptana, S. (2016). Analisis daya saing dan dampak kebijakan pemerintah terhadap komoditas kedelai vs pengusahaan kedelai di kabupaten Lamongan, Jawa Timur. Forum Agribisnis: Agribusiness Forum, 6(1), 21–52.
Suratiyah, K. (2008). Ilmu usaha tani. Penebar Swadaya.
Susetyo, B. (2010). Statistika untuk analisis data penelitian. PT Refika Aditama.
Swastika, D. K. S. (2016). Kinerja produksi dan konsumsi serta prospek pencapaian swasembada kedelai di Indonesia. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 33(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v33n2.2015.149-160
Tastra, I. K., Erliana, G., & Gatot S. A. Fatah. (2012). Menuju swasembada kedelai melalui penerapan kebijakan yang sinergis. Iptek Tanaman Pangan, 7(1), 47–57.
Yardha, & Arman. (2022). Teknologi pengelolaan benih sumber kedelai di Provinsi Jambi. Jurnal Sains Agro, 7(1), 79–88. https://ojs.umb-bungo.ac.id/index.php/saingro/article/view/782/739
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aisya Allela Rachman, Darsono, Ernoiz Antriyandarti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The author sends the manuscript with the understanding that if accepted for publication, the copyright of the article belongs to the author and retains publishing rights without restriction.
Copyright includes the non-exclusive right to reproduce and submit articles in all forms and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilm, and other similar reproductions, as well as translations. Reproduction of any part of this journal, its storage in the database and its transmission by all forms of media, such as electronic, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopying, recording, magnetic media, etc.
The journal editorial board makes every effort to ensure that no false or misleading data, opinions, or statements are published in the journal. Either way, the contents of articles and advertisements published in journals are the sole and exclusive responsibility of each writer and advertiser.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)
Download Template
